This question is regard to enhanced n-type MOSFETs. From what I understand, an inversion layer is formed underneath the insulating layer below the gate of the MOSFET when a voltage is applied to the gate. When this voltage exceeds \$V_\mathrm{T}\$, the threshold voltage; this inversion layer allows electrons to flow from the source to the drain. If a voltage \$V_\mathrm{DS}\$ is now applied, the inversion region will begin to taper and eventually, it will taper so much that it will pinch-off, once it has pinched-off (it can no longer shrink in height), it will then begin to shrink in length (width) becoming closer and closer to the source.
My questions are:
- Is what I've said so far correct?
- Why does this pinch-off occur? I don't understand what my book says. It says something about the electric field at the drain being also proportional to the gate.
- It is my understanding that when the MOSFET is saturated, a depletion layer forms between the pinched-off bit and the drain. How does current flow through this depleted portion to the drain? I thought the depletion layer does not conduct... Like in a diode...
Answer
Your description is correct: given that \$V_{GS}>V_T\$, if we apply a Drain-to-Source voltage of magnitude \$V_{SAT}=V_{GS}-V_{T}\$ or higher, the channel will pinch-off.
I'll try to explain what happens there. I'm assuming n-type MOSFET in the examples, but the explanations also hold for p-type MOSFET (with some adjustments, of course).
The reason for pinch-off:
Think about the electric potential along the channel: it equals \$V_S\$ near the Source; it equals \$V_D\$ near the Drain. Recall also that potential function is continuous. The immediate conclusion from the above two statements is that potential changes continuously form \$V_S\$ to \$V_D\$ along the channel (let me be non-formal and use terms "potential" and "voltage" interchangeably).
Now, let's see how the above conclusion affects the charge in the inversion layer. Recall that this charge is accumulated under the Gate due to Gate-to-Substrate voltage (yes, Substrate, not Source. The reason we usually use \$V_{GS}\$ in our calculations is because we assume that the Substrate and the Source are connected to the same potential). Now, if the potential change along the channel when we apply \$V_{DS}\$, the Gate-to-Substrate voltage also change along the channel, which means that the induced charge density will vary along the channel.
When we apply \$V_{SAT}=V_{GS}-V_{T}\$ to the Drain, the effective Gate-to-Substrate voltage near the Drain will become: \$V_{eff}=V_{GS}-V_{SAT}=V_T\$. It means that near the Drain the Gate-to-Substrate voltage is just enough to form the inversion layer. Any higher potential applied to Darin will cause this voltage to reduce below the Threshold voltage and the channel will not be formed - pinch-off occurs.
What happens between the pinch-off point and the Drain:
The Gate-to-Substrate voltage in this region is not enough for a formation of the inversion layer, therefore this region is only depleted (as opposed to inverted). While depletion region lacks mobile carriers, there is no restriction on current flow through it: if a carrier enters the depletion region from one side, and there is an electric field across the region - this carrier will be dragged by the field. In addition, carriers which enter this depletion region have initial speed.
All the above is true as long as the carriers in question will not recombine in the depletion region. In n-type MOSFET the depletion region lacks p-type carriers, but the current consist of n-type carriers - this means that the probability for recombination of these carriers is very low (and may be neglected for any practical purpose).
Conclusion: charge carriers which enter this depletion region will be accelerated by the field across this region and will eventually reach the drain. It is usually the case that the resistivity of this region may be completely neglected (the physical reason for this is quite complex - this discussion is more appropriate for physics forum).
Hope this helps
No comments:
Post a Comment