As I understand it, for a signal $f(t)$ in time, its Laplace transform $\mathfrak{L}\left\{f(t)\right\}=F_1(s)$ and Z transform $\mathfrak{Z}\left\{f(t)\right\}=F_2(z)$ are related by a transformation $z=e^{sT}\leftrightarrow s=1/T\,\log(z)$ where $T$ is the sampling period (since the Z transform is discrete in time).
In practice, this is approximated to the first degree as follows z=esT=esT/2e−sT/2≈1+sT/21−sT/2
Now, I understand up to here, but I fail to understand why we use this particular first-order approximation over, say, $z=e^{sT}\approx1+sT\leftrightarrow s\approx(z-1)/T=\frac{1-z^{-1}}{Tz^{-1}}$.
Does this approximation 'behave' in some significantly poorer way for most purposes?
Sorry about the tags -- I tried various things like 'bilinear-transform' but they did not exist and I lack the points to create them.
No comments:
Post a Comment