Wednesday 26 June 2019

identification - Is there some logic in IC name prefixes?


There are hundreds of prefixes in IC names, this page lists a number of them. For some it's easy to see that they refer to the manufacturer's name, like AD for Analog Devices or LT for Linear Technology. Others can be found with several manufacturers, often three letter prefixes: SAA, SAF, SDA, TCA and TDA, to name a few. I wonder if there's some logic in this, like T** being a specific group with subgroup TD*, etc. Is there a logical structure?



Answer



Manufacturers often do use their own prefix for original products, or may continue to use a prefix of a company or product line that was acquired.


As the number of IC available has continuously grown the complexity of the naming schemes have become less obvious, and more exceptions exist.


For example MAX- prefix typically refers to a Maxim IC, including the well-known MAX232 except MAX232 is also made by TI.


The NE5532 available from JRC, TI and On Semi, was originally designed by Signetics and continue to use the NE- prefix.



Other than business unit / company (original or acquired), the next most popular prefix convention would be series or technology based. Here I'm thinking of Op-Amps such as TL-, which are JFET or BiFET based op-amp technology AFAIK.


Of course there are nearly as many exceptions to the rule as the rule covers, so like life, it's messy.


No comments:

Post a Comment

arduino - Can I use TI's cc2541 BLE as micro controller to perform operations/ processing instead of ATmega328P AU to save cost?

I am using arduino pro mini (which contains Atmega328p AU ) along with cc2541(HM-10) to process and transfer data over BLE to smartphone. I...