Thursday, 6 April 2017

frequency - Under what conditions does jw equal the laplace variable s in an electrical circuit?



Imagine I've got an electromagnetic actuator and solved the underlying differential equations. I got an solution for sinusodially excitation, as follows (just an example, no physical backround):


G(jω)=I(jω)U(jω)=11+jωT


Now I just set


jω=s,sLaplace Variable


to get


G(s)=11+sT


and I claim that this is the transfer function for the electrical circuit feeding the actuator. I'm sure the results I get are correct, but I was told I can't just set jω=s

without further explication.


So I wonder what are the conditions to do what I've done, how can I proof that both equations are correct and explain that in a correct mathematical way? I feel that everybody (in literature) either just does it or avoids the issue.




Further explanation:



Above system G(jw) shows a low-pass behavior in the frequency domain, means for sinusodially voltage excitation i(jω)=G(jω)u(jω)=11+jωTu(jω)

I get a higher damping the higher the frequency of the excitation.


But we also know that a transfer function i(s)=G(s)u(s)=11+sTu(s)

excited by a unitary step u(s)=u0s
will also lead to a valid solution, namely the typical exponential i(t)=u0(1et/T)
PT1-behavior.


So what is the condition, that a system which is valid in the frequency domain for harmonic signals in steady-state, is also valid in the Laplace-domain by setting jω=s

for the non-steady-state e.g. for excitation with a unitary step?




No comments:

Post a Comment

arduino - Can I use TI's cc2541 BLE as micro controller to perform operations/ processing instead of ATmega328P AU to save cost?

I am using arduino pro mini (which contains Atmega328p AU ) along with cc2541(HM-10) to process and transfer data over BLE to smartphone. I...