I used the summing-point constraint and KVL to get $V_{R_1<<}=V_{\text{in}}$. Followed by a voltage divider for the node left of $R_L$; yielding:
VR1<<=Vin=Vo(R1R1+R2)2⟺VoVin=(R1+R2)2R21=1+2R2R1+R22R21
However, textbook claims it's: 1+3R2R1+R22R21
Answer
The textbook is correct.
Let $R_{1\text{L}}$ and $R_{2\text{L}}$ refer to the leftmost $R_1$ and $R_2$, respectively, and $R_{1\text{R}}$ and $R_{2\text{R}}$ refer to the rightmost $R_1$ and $R_2$, respectively.
The voltage at the inverting input of the op amp is $V_- = V_{\text{in}}$, so the current through $R_{1\text{L}}$ is $V_{\text{in}}/R_{1\text{L}}$. Since there is ideally no current into the op amp's input, the current through $R_{2\text{L}}$ is also $V_{\text{in}}/R_{1\text{L}}$.
The voltage across $R_{2\text{L}}$ is
VinR1LR2L
by Ohm's Law.
The voltage $V_M$ at the middle node (at the T intersection of the resistors) is therefore
VM=Vin+VinR1LR2L
The current through $R_{1\text{R}}$ is $V_{M}/R_{1\text{R}}$. The current through $R_{2\text{R}}$ is this current plus the current through $R_{2\text{L}}$:
VMR1R+VinR1L
so the voltage across it is
(VMR1R+VinR1L)R2R
This voltage plus $V_M$ is $V_{\text{out}}$:
Vout=VM+(VMR1R+VinR1L)R2R
Substituting $(1)$ into $(2)$ and dropping the L and R from the subscripts:
Vout=Vin+VinR1R2+(Vin+VinR1R2R1+VinR1)R2=Vin(1+R2R1+R2R1+R22R21+R2R1)=Vin(1+3R2R1+R22R21)
VoutVin=1+3R2R1+R22R21
No comments:
Post a Comment