While simulating with LTSpice I discovered the simulator gives milliamps of inverting and non-inverting terminal current in op amps and also the same thing for MOSFETs, milliamps into gates. Here is a simple circuit demonstrating the current into a non-inverting terminal with an op amp. I will also put down that I measured only nanoamps of current into op amp inverting and non inverting terminals and also MOSFET gates in Multisim to verify that LTspice is incorrectly giving results, which leads me to believe LTSpice is seriously flawed and this should be reported to developers. Is this normal or is it a bug which should be reported to developers?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
arduino - Can I use TI's cc2541 BLE as micro controller to perform operations/ processing instead of ATmega328P AU to save cost?
I am using arduino pro mini (which contains Atmega328p AU ) along with cc2541(HM-10) to process and transfer data over BLE to smartphone. I...
-
operational amplifier - What is the advantage of the inverting opamp circuit over non-inverting one?Op amp circuits are designed to achieve a specific gain regardless of the differences between individual op amps. One very common circuit ha...
-
Related question: Ceramic capacitors: how to read 3-digit markings? I have some ceramic capacitors with a 2-digit marking. How to read them?...
-
I'm having an issue with my Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) feedback circuit. The output is not behaving as expected. My board schematic ...
-
Can you please give me a definition, or at least a more specific context, of the term "point-of-load" converter/regulator? I have ...
-
My input is an FM carrier of 80.00MHz. It is FM modulated with 625kbpsec data. The deviation from carrier is about +/-700kHz. The data never...
-
My application has a small device, which draws about a watt, and is powered through a small dynamo, backed by a battery: The dynamo generate...
-
Looking at all the various schematics of op amps, regulators, etc. I see lots of multicollector or multiemitter BJTs (and why no multibase?)...
No comments:
Post a Comment