Thursday 14 July 2016

High Resolution ADC for Noisy Sensors in Variable Conditions


Intro



In response to this question about adaptive amplifiers, It was recommended that in order to deal with variable conditions, it may be more economical to simply use an ADC with higher resolution so that I don't need to worry about amplification and I can do scaling in software.


Overview


I'm trying to design a data acquisition circuit for body mounted textile-based stretch sensors. The textile varies resistance as it's stretched (about 1 order of magnitude, 10k\$\Omega\$-100k\$\Omega\$ with 30% stretch). The exact ranges will change depending on how the textile is cut, whether it's soaked with sweat, the temperature, how old the material is, how it's mounted, etc. The entire thing needs to be as small as possible because it's mounted on the hand, so minimizing the number of components is a big plus.


Moreover, I'd like the circuit to be reusable for other applications that may have worse performance. For instance, if I use a cheaper version of the textile, my resistance range may be as bad as 100\$\Omega\$ to 300\$\Omega\$.


Signal Path


[textile] -> [Wheatstone bridge] -> [lowpass] -> [instrumentation amp] -> [ADC] -> [AVR]


Requirements


So, I'm looking for an ADC that will meet my requirements. The ADC should be:



  1. 16bits+


  2. As easy to use as possible: much better if there is interface code already written for AVR/Arduino...

  3. ...yet at the same time as comprehensive as possible: I've seen some ADC's with lowpass filters and PGA's built in – all the better as long as it doesn't make configuration a pain

  4. 8+ channels, or if it's easy enough to implement, 2x 4+ channels. EDIT: If I'm using a Wheatstone bridge, perhaps I want 8 differential input channels (so 16 channels)...

  5. I don't think operation voltage matters... (best if not above 5V)

  6. Surface mount

  7. Doesn't need to be cheap (it's a one-off)

  8. SPI vs. I2C doesn't matter I think...

  9. 100+ Hz


Research



So far through Googling, I've found the following chips:



and the following tutorials:



Voltage Reference?


Finally, some people have recommended a precision voltage reference, such as the Analog Devices REF19x series. Do you think this is necessary? Resolution is definitely important for me.


Conclusion


Let me know if you have any recommendations! I'm also not sure exactly what I'm looking for, so tips on how to decide are also appreciated.




No comments:

Post a Comment

arduino - Can I use TI's cc2541 BLE as micro controller to perform operations/ processing instead of ATmega328P AU to save cost?

I am using arduino pro mini (which contains Atmega328p AU ) along with cc2541(HM-10) to process and transfer data over BLE to smartphone. I...