Saturday, 12 September 2015

waterproof - State of the art of waterproofing



There is a new electronics waterproofing material / technique branded as Liquipel. Not much info is available, but supposedly it is a hydrophobic compound that is applied to the target electronic device by using vapor deposition in a vacuum while ionizing the target device so that the Liquipel particles are attracted to coat every nook and cranny of the device on the microscale.


Unfortunately, no one has chemically tried to identify the composition of Liquipel yet -- for all I know, it could be the same as Rain-X or something equally cheap. And it is not possible to buy Liquipel canisters; the company only applies this coating as a service.


Given that electrostatically-targeted, vapor-deposited, microscale hydrophobic coating seems to be the best way to waterproof arbitrary electronic devices, what is the state of the art in non-proprietary versions of this technique or a similar technique? Does anyone know a chemical that would work in this way? Any instructions for DIY vapor deposition? Or is there any simpler approach, like dipping the whole circuit board in some hydrophobic yet sticky liquid?



Answer



The best existing solution is something that is called parylene, if you can put a film of this down without pin holes then you can have a water barrier and dielectric barrier. Often used in space and extreme environments. I've seen a 20KV voltage source that looked like a bare board that you can hold in your hand.


Parylene is relatively expensive, partly because of raw material cost, partly because of application technique. It is applied as an evaporative coating, which can be very wasteful as it coats the inside of the chamber so only a small percentage ends up on the board.


Whether of not this Liquipel can be used in electronics will have to be tested. What is important is that you form a physical barrier that bonds to the surface. The material that I saw demonstations of in the past (80% that it is this Liquipel) used a nano-layer to entrain/entrap air as a buffering layer. This material will wear off eventually and counts on a rough surface (nanoscopically) to entrap air which then form the "barrier". So it is using van der waals forces and not covalent bonds. These bonds could be saturated with other materials after mechanical abrasion/contact. Also at corners, say the edges of leads on a IC package I could see that this would be a place where this material might fail as a nanoscale structure might not conform around a corner fully.


But these are areas to look at, not necessarily a reason to reject it until proven not to work.


No comments:

Post a Comment

arduino - Can I use TI's cc2541 BLE as micro controller to perform operations/ processing instead of ATmega328P AU to save cost?

I am using arduino pro mini (which contains Atmega328p AU ) along with cc2541(HM-10) to process and transfer data over BLE to smartphone. I...