Tuesday, 25 July 2017

Different recommendations for ethernet front end terminaton?


I’ve noticed different MAC/PHY manufacturers have different recommended termination recommendations for their Ethernet front end.


Why does everyone do a variant on the same theme? Does it come down to designer’s preference, or is there a good reason?



I’ve included 3 examples below.


In image 1, the center taps of the transformer are tied to 3.3v and the data lines are terminated to ground through a ~50R resistor and 100nF capacitor. enter image description here Image Source: http://www.siongboon.com/projects/2006-03-06_serial_communication/an-139%20(how%20to%20route%20ethernet%20PCB).pdf


Image 2, the center taps are tied to 3.3v along with the ~50R termination resistors. The advantage I can see here is reduced component count (no 100nF caps to block the DC path). enter image description here Image Source: http://www.nxp.com/files/microcontrollers/doc/app_note/AN2759.pdf


Image 3, this is a bit of a mix of the above two configurations with another small difference thrown in. Only one of the center taps is tied to 3.3V. The other center tap is tied to ground through a capacitor. TX termination resistors are tied to 3.3V, while RX termination resistors are tied to ground through a capacitor. Image Source: http://docs.tibbo.com/soism/index.html?em200_pin_ether.htm enter image description here



Answer



It is a strictly hardware dependant issue. All of these PHY layer IC's have 50 ohm differential input and outputs to match the magnetics and ethernet cable. All of these IC's have PECL outputs but inputs can vary as to whether a bias current is needed or not. There are many PHY layer IC's on the market with various CPU/MPU connections, but at the magnetics layer the variations are minor, having mostly to do with bias currents.

What is different is if the 3.3 volt source is built into the IC or is external, including receive and transmit. The slight differences are for impedance matching to a fine degree (including DC blocking caps). The goal is maximum frequency response with little DC bias current in the magnetics.

Internal servo loops and 8bit/10bit conversion keeps DC imbalance in the magnetics to a minimum or bit errors could occur. There are designs where 48vdc is carried over the ethernet cable and taken off the tx and rx center taps for POE (power over ethernet).


No comments:

Post a Comment

arduino - Can I use TI's cc2541 BLE as micro controller to perform operations/ processing instead of ATmega328P AU to save cost?

I am using arduino pro mini (which contains Atmega328p AU ) along with cc2541(HM-10) to process and transfer data over BLE to smartphone. I...